<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Multiprocessor Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com</link>
	<description>Multicore / Multiprocessor Hardware and Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:32:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Resurgence of Parallelism</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=364</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=364#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Communications of the ACM.  Jack Dennis and Peter Denning, two of the pioneers in computing describe how parallelism has been with us for a while:
The Resurgence of Parallelism
Parallel computation is making a comeback after a quarter century of neglect. Past research can be put to quick use today.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://cacm.acm.org/">Communications of the ACM</a>.  Jack Dennis and Peter Denning, two of the pioneers in computing describe how parallelism has been with us for a while:</p>
<p><a href="http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2010/6/92479-the-resurgence-of-parallelism/fulltext">The Resurgence of Parallelism</a></p>
<p>Parallel computation is making a comeback after a quarter century of neglect. Past research can be put to quick use today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=364</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadcom takes stake in multicore pioneer Tilera</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=362</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=362#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tilera, perhaps the last of the first crop of massively multicore startups, gets funding from Broadcom.  From the EE Times:  Broadcom takes stake in multicore pioneer Tilera
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tilera.com/">Tilera</a>, perhaps the last of the first crop of massively multicore startups, gets funding from Broadcom.  From the <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/">EE Times</a>:  <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223200066">Broadcom takes stake in multicore pioneer Tilera</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=362</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March is the month of multi-core CPUs</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=360</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=360#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Inquirer:  March is the month of multi-core CPUs.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/">Inquirer</a>:  <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/feature/1593968/march-multi-core-cpus">March is the month of multi-core CPUs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=360</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARM invasion moves past mobile market</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=358</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=358#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good article on ARM from EE Times Asia:  ARM invasion moves past mobile market.  Interesting that ARM ships 90 cores per second.  But when it comes to multicore:
Many SoC designers—and ARM licensees—are struggling on one issue in today&#8217;s environment of multiple GPUs and MPUs: Is there a compiler that can automatically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good article on ARM from <a href="http://www.eetasia.com/">EE Times Asia</a>:  <a href="http://www.eetasia.com/ART_8800592426_499495_NT_4bdfae08.HTM">ARM invasion moves past mobile market</a>.  Interesting that ARM ships 90 cores<em> per second</em>.  But when it comes to multicore:</p>
<blockquote><p>Many SoC designers—and ARM licensees—are struggling on one issue in today&#8217;s environment of multiple GPUs and MPUs: Is there a compiler that can automatically spread load energy efficiently across those multiple cores in a SoC?</p>
<p>ARM&#8217;s answer is, no, not yet.</p>
<p>Acknowledging that &#8220;huge software challenges are coming,&#8221; Inglis said, &#8220;Many SoC vendors are, just about now, running into an &#8216;oops&#8217; phase.&#8221; He warned that the industry is still in a very early stage of using multiple cores for their SoCs. &#8220;Real SoCs based on multiple cores to run real applications are just about to come out now. They are being debugged. Many engineers are suddenly asking, &#8216;how do you run all these tasks in so many cores?&#8217;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=358</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel 48-Core &#8220;Single-Chip Cloud Computer&#8221; Improves Power Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=356</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=356#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From PC World:  Intel 48-Core &#8220;Single-Chip Cloud Computer&#8221; Improves Power Efficiency  This just as the Larabee CPU +GPU is being canceled.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/">PC World</a>:  <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/183653/intel_48core_singlechip_cloud_computer_improves_power_efficiency.html">Intel 48-Core &#8220;Single-Chip Cloud Computer&#8221; Improves Power Efficiency</a>  This just as the Larabee CPU +GPU is being canceled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=356</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel: Initial Larrabee graphics chip canceled</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=354</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=354#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Cnet:  Intel: Initial Larrabee graphics chip canceled  This was the INtel CPU + GPU device.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://news.cnet.com/">Cnet</a>:  <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10409715-64.html">Intel: Initial Larrabee graphics chip canceled</a>  This was the INtel CPU + GPU device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=354</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Go</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=347</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=347#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has announced a new concurrent language called Go.  It&#8217;s been described as Python meets C++.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/">Google</a> has announced a new concurrent language called <a href="http://golang.org/">Go</a>.  It&#8217;s been described as Python meets C++.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=347</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The multicore future, and how to survive it</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=343</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=343#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Register:  The multicore future, and how to survive it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/">The Register</a>:  <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/25/multicore_developments/">The multicore future, and how to survive it</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=343</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sun, IBM push multicore boundaries</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=339</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=339#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the EE Times, a new Sun (Oracle?) 128 thread, 16 core device called Rainbow Falls.  IBM is also producing the Power7 PowerPC-based 128 thread, 8 core device built into a 4-device module:  Sun, IBM push multicore boundaries
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/">EE Times</a>, a new Sun (Oracle?) 128 thread, 16 core device called Rainbow Falls.  IBM is also producing the Power7 PowerPC-based 128 thread, 8 core device built into a 4-device module:  <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=219500130">Sun, IBM push multicore boundaries</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=339</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petascale and Multicore</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=336</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=336#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems clear that multicore will be playing a key role in modern supercomputing.  Dan Reid&#8217;s blog posting (reproduced in CACM) titled When Petascale is Just Too Slow has a bit worth quoting at the end:
I believe it is time for us to move from our deus ex machina model of explicitly managed resources [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems clear that multicore will be playing a key role in modern supercomputing.  Dan Reid&#8217;s blog posting (reproduced in CACM) titled <a href="http://www.hpcdan.org/reeds_ruminations/2009/04/when-petascale-is-just-too-slow.html">When Petascale is Just Too Slow</a> has a bit worth quoting at the end:</p>
<blockquote><p>I believe it is time for us to move from our deus ex machina model of explicitly managed resources to a fully distributed, asynchronous model that embraces component failure as a standard occurrence. To draw a biological analogy, we must reason about systemic, organism health and behavior rather than cellular signaling and death, and not allow cell death (component failure) to trigger organism death (system failure). Such a shift in world view has profound implications for how we structure the future of international high-performance computing research, academic-government-industrial collaborations and system procurements.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps the necessities of programming very (very) large systems may force some of the software issues currently hamstringing multicore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=336</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel now has Cilk inside</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=333</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=333#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow I missed this one, too.  Cilk is also now a part of Intel:  Intel now has Cilk inside.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I missed this one, too.  <a href="http://www.cilk.com/">Cilk</a> is also now a part of Intel:  <a href="http://insidehpc.com/2009/08/04/intel-acquires-cilk-parallel-programming-technology/">Intel now has Cilk inside</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=333</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RapidMind Gets Swallowed by Intel</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=330</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=330#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The multicore world, like much of the business world, has be quiet lately.  But this interesting bit of news came through the HPC Wire.  It seems there was no press release by either Intel nor RapidMind:  RapidMind Gets Swallowed by Intel
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The multicore world, like much of the business world, has be quiet lately.  But this interesting bit of news came through the <a href="http://www.hpcwire.com/">HPC Wire</a>.  It seems there was no press release by either Intel nor RapidMind:  <a href="http://www.hpcwire.com/blogs/RapidMind-Gets-Swallowed-by-Intel-53829487.html">RapidMind Gets Swallowed by Intel</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=330</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keynote: Help is on the way for multicore software</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=328</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=328#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A talk from Stanford professor and early multicore researcher Kunle Olukotun:  Keynote: Help is on the way for multicore software
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A talk from Stanford professor and early multicore researcher Kunle Olukotun:  <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218100116">Keynote: Help is on the way for multicore software</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=328</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Axum, Microsoftâ€™s Approach to Parallelism</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=326</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=326#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From InfoQ:  Axum, Microsoftâ€™s Approach to Parallelism
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.infoq.com/">InfoQ</a>:  <a href="http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/04/Axum">Axum, Microsoftâ€™s Approach to Parallelism</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=326</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiprocessor debug startup raises seed funding</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=324</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=324#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the EE Times:  Multiprocessor debug startup raises seed funding
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://eetimes.com/">EE Times</a>:  <a href="http://eetimes.com/news/design/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216401966">Multiprocessor debug startup raises seed funding</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=324</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gartner explores reality of x86 parallelism</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=320</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=320#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some comments from Gartner on the future of multicore:
Gartner explores reality of x86 parallelism  An interesting quote on the software vs. hardware mismatch:
The impact is akin to putting a Ferrari engine in a go-cart; the power may be there, but design mismatches severely limit the ability to exploit it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some comments from Gartner on the future of multicore:<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/03/multicore-expo-explores-reality-of-x86-parallelism.ars">Gartner explores reality of x86 parallelism</a>  An interesting quote on the software vs. hardware mismatch:</p>
<blockquote><p>The impact is akin to putting a Ferrari engine in a go-cart; the power may be there, but design mismatches severely limit the ability to exploit it.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=320</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multicore Chips Pose Next Big Challenge for Industry</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=317</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=317#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A popular article from PC World magazine:  Multicore Chips Pose Next Big Challenge for Industry.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A popular article from <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/">PC World</a> magazine:  <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/161698/multicore_chips_pose_next_big_challenge_for_industry.html">Multicore Chips Pose Next Big Challenge for Industry</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=317</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multicore CPUs face slow road in comms</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=314</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=314#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An EE Times article on the slow road to multicore in comms:
Multicore CPUs face slow road in comms, The culprit: complex, fragmented technology.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/">EE Times</a> article on the slow road to multicore in comms:<br />
<a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=215901460">Multicore CPUs face slow road in comms, The culprit: complex, fragmented technology</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=314</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The long slog to multicore land</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=311</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=311#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Register:  The long slog to multicore land
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/">the Register</a>:  <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/18/multicore_tools/">The long slog to multicore land</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=311</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=310</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=310#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A one page IEEE Spectrum paper discusses the memory wall in supercomputer applications:Â  Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A one page <a title="IEEE Spectrum" href="http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/">IEEE Spectrum</a> paper discusses the memory wall in supercomputer applications:Â  <a title="Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers" href="http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/nov08/6912">Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=310</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Multicore Kill the x86?</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=309</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=309#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the HPC Wire:Â  Will Multicore Kill the x86?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a title="HPC Wire" href="http://www.hpcwire.com/">HPC Wire</a>:Â  <a title="Will Multicore Kill the x86?" href="http://www.hpcwire.com/blogs/Will-Multicore-Kill-the-x86-37305429.html">Will Multicore Kill the x86?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=309</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RapidMind blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=308</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=308#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RapidMind, makers of tools for multicore devices, has a nice blog page that discusses various multicore issues.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="RapidMind" href="http://www.rapidmind.com/">RapidMind</a>, makers of tools for multicore devices, has a nice <a title="RapidMind blogs" href="http://blogs.rapidmind.com/">blog page</a> that discusses various multicore issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=308</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xilinx targets multicore processor design</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=307</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=307#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Xilinx announces its dual PowerPC core FPGA (from Electrionics Weekly):Â  Xilinx targets multicore processor design
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Xilinx" href="http://www.xilinx.com/">Xilinx</a> announces its dual PowerPC core FPGA (from <a title="Electronics Weekly" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/">Electrionics Weekly</a>):Â  <a title="Xilinx targets multicore processor design" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/Articles/2008/11/04/44850/xilinx-targets-multicore-processor-design.htm">Xilinx targets multicore processor design</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=307</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domeika&#8217;s Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=306</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=306#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just ran across Max Domeika&#8217;s blog, Domeika&#8217;s Dilemma.Â  Max is an Intel multicore guy who has recently published a book on this subject (see his blog for more details).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ran across Max Domeika&#8217;s blog, <a title="Domeika's Dilemma" href="http://www.chipdesignmag.com/domeika/">Domeika&#8217;s Dilemma</a>.Â  Max is an Intel multicore guy who has recently published a book on this subject (see his blog for more details).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=306</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multicore: the future of SOCs?</title>
		<link>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=305</link>
		<comments>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=305#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Guccione</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From EDN:Â  Multicore: the future of SOCs?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a title="EDN" href="http://www.edn.com/">EDN</a>:Â  <a title="Multicore: the future of SOCs?" href="http://www.edn.com/article/CA6607194.html">Multicore: the future of SOCs?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.MultiprocessorReport.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=305</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
